When comparing online poker to live poker, the live tournament scenario proves to be different and more complex. Mono-disciplinary analysis based on mathematics and probability calculation, while effective in online poker, is not enough to tackle the challenges of live poker. In fact, long-term quantitative strategies no longer work due to the dominance of variance and the impossibility of “massing” as in online poker. In the context of live tournaments, identifying opponents’ playing ranges during the pre-flop phase is more complicated than in online poker. Software like Hold’em Manager can establish players’ typical behavior and translate each opponent’s behavior into percentage indices, held during the various phases of the spot.

Skills in Live Texas Hold’em Poker – Towards an Interdisciplinary Approach
However, for the software to be reliable, it must process tens of thousands of actions from the observed subject. Compared to the thousand hands per hour processed by an online professional playing on twenty tables, a live tournament has an average of only twenty-five hands. Quantitative analysis proves to be ineffective in live poker due to variance and the limited number of hands played. To overcome these difficulties, new tools are needed that offer qualitative analysis models capable of investigating the “here and now” and abandoning classical quantitative models. This new approach requires the integration of other disciplines, such as Communication Theories, to interpret opponents’ verbal and non-verbal information and make more accurate strategic decisions. In this way, players can more effectively face the challenges of live poker and adapt to the changing dynamics of the game.
Follow our publications on the future developments of SPI and their impact on live poker, and share your opinions with us as well. Together we can shape the future of Texas Hold’em as an Olympic sport, even more competitive and skill-based.